The Cleveland of England?
Maybe it's Liverpool. As I learned from watching Time Team this morning, Liverpool peaked hard, growing from a 7-street town along a muddy riverbank to a seaport city of over 70,000 in just a few short years. (Sounds familiar.) Here's some more from the Shrinking Cities website:
[Manchester and Liverpool] are long-standing rivals. Manchester was a prominent centre of world trade, whilst Liverpool, with its docks, was the logistical centre for the region's textile factories. Later on, they sought to outdo each other with their football teams, their music scenes and their cultural institutions.With the disintegration of the textile industry in the county of Lancashire, Manchester und Liverpool experienced a severe decline from 1950 onwards. Around 1930, both boasted approximately 850,000 inhabitants; today, only about half as many people live within the city boundaries of each. In both places, extreme de-industrialisation and suburbanisation went arm-in-arm with growing poverty among the working class and an increasing rate of population loss. The nadir of decline was marked by violent riots in Manchester's Moss Side and Liverpool's Toxteth districts in 1981.
Change a few details (and substitute "Cleveland and Pittsburgh" for "Liverpool and Manchester") and the story sounds even more familiar!
5 Comments:
I saw the title of your entry and before I even started to read, I thought, "Easy. It's Manchester." Spend three days there and you won't be able to escape the similarities.
I believe the Cleveland of England is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland,_England
I'm not surprised that it's in the North. The North is England's Midwest.
I grew up an hour outside Cleveland, and went to grad school in Leeds- which reminded me alot of Cleveland- northern industrial city- good town, and good people.
Interesting stuff. Thanks.
Post a Comment
<< Home